Writing Tips Writing your euthanasia research paper would be more difficult for you than a simple essay. Nevertheless, if you know the structure and know what to do in each part of your research, nothing is impossible!
Open in a separate window The proportion of non-treatment decisions also differed substantially between countries: Alleviation of pain and symptoms while taking into account or appreciating hastening of death as a possible side-effect happened more frequently and in comparable rates in all countries: These rates show that end-of-life decision-making with a possible or certain life-shortening effect is practiced everywhere in the studied West-European countries.
End-of-life decisions Euthanasia research question are mainly a medical response to the suffering of patients, such as alleviation of pain and symptoms, are performed in rather similar frequencies. However, the frequency of end-of-life decisions that are to a large extent determined by cultural Euthanasia research question as euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide and non-treatment decisions—varies much more between the countries.
Another striking finding of this study was that in countries where patients and relatives are more often involved in the decision-making at the end of life, the frequency of end-of-life decisions was higher, for example in the Netherlands.
Many terminally ill patients who are facing death are offered interventions that may prolong their lives but at the same time may diminish their quality of life, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation or nasal-gastric feeding tubes. Discussion between patient, relatives and professional caregivers about whether or not to use such interventions may result in the recognition that quality of life is sometimes to be preferred over prolonging life at all costs.
What Have We Learnt? While initially we thought that the high response rates of the Dutch studies could probably be explained by the Dutch Euthanasia research question of openness about the subject, our European study showed that quite large proportions of physicians in other countries were also willing to share their experiences.
Second, our research shows that end-of-life decision-making is a significant aspect of end-of-life care. In approximately 4 out of every 10 patients, death is preceded by a decision that possibly or certainly hastened their dying process.
Rather, it is also aimed at improving the quality of life of patients through the prevention and relief of their symptoms, sometimes to the extent that far-reaching decisions such as euthanasia are requested by the patient. Third, public control and transparency of the practice of euthanasia is to a large extent possible, at least in the Netherlands.
The review and notification procedure has increasingly been accepted by physicians, which shows their trust in the system.
A last important lesson that can be learnt is that the legalization of euthanasia in the Netherlands did not result in a slippery slope for medical end-of-life practices. Besides religious or principal-based arguments, the slippery slope argument is the mainstay of opponents of the legalization of euthanasia.
Briefly, the argument states that: B is morally not acceptable; therefore, we must not allow A Griffiths et al. Our studies show no evidence of a slippery slope. The frequency of ending of life without explicit patient request did not increase over the studied years.
Also, there is no evidence for a higher frequency of euthanasia among the elderly, people with low educational status, the poor, the physically disabled or chronically ill, minors, people with psychiatric illnesses including depression, or racial or ethnic minorities, compared with background populations Battin et al.
The best example of such an open concept is the condition that the patient should suffer unbearably. In the Chabot-casethe Court decided that suffering that has a non-somatic origin such as a severe and refractory depression can also be a justification for euthanasia; in the Brongersma-case this was further specified in the sense that suffering should originate from a medically classifiable disease, either somatic or psychiatric Griffiths et al.
Euthanasia is most often performed in cases of severe suffering due to physical disease and symptoms and severe function loss, for patients with a limited life expectancy Onwuteaka-Philipsen et al. In such cases there is usually little discussion about whether or not the suffering was unbearable.
|Questions and Answers on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide||Euthanasia law Research Resources To Write Euthanasia Thesis It is your thesis research that will make your euthanasia thesis great and impressive.|
|Search form||Enjoy free essays, examples of research papers, sample term papers, free dissertation samples and paper writing tips for all students. Example papers and sample papers on the most popular topics.|
|Effective Papers: Research Paper on Euthanasia||Enjoy free essays, examples of research papers, sample term papers, free dissertation samples and paper writing tips for all students.|
|Order Your Custom Thesis Writing Now!||Writing Tips Writing your euthanasia research paper would be more difficult for you than a simple essay.|
|Reflections on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Fr. Do we have a "right to die?|
A previous study showed that a quarter of physicians who receive euthanasia requests find it problematic to assess the criteria of due care Buiting et al. Problems are mostly related to the assessment of whether the patient suffered unbearably.
To assess unbearability, physicians have to know how their patients experience the suffering, and there is no specific instrument to do so. What can be objectively determined is the underlying disease and the accompanying symptoms and loss of function.
Hence, what is still bearable for one person may be unbearable for another. Some claim this makes the unbearability of suffering something a physician can hardly assess and which should mainly be left to the judgment of the patient Beijk ; Buiting et al.
Yet, the review committees argue that suffering should be at least partly open to objectification Regional Euthanasia Review Committees Consequently, it is likely that physicians may have different opinions about which suffering can count as a legitimate ground for euthanasia.
On the one hand, different opinions about when suffering becomes unbearable could be interpreted as problematic. From the perspective of a patient, it may partly be a matter of chance whether a request for euthanasia will be granted.
However, it is likely that this problem mainly exists in boundary cases, which are a minority of the euthanasia cases in the Netherlands Onwuteaka-Philipsen et al. From this point of view, difficulties with interpreting whether suffering is unbearable and potential differences between physicians and patients are to be expected and are consistent with the legal system of euthanasia in the Netherlands Thus, although assessing when suffering becomes unbearable is highly personal and ultimately depends on the experience of the person who is suffering, fostering societal and professional discussion and case law can further stimulate the exploration of the legal and moral boundaries of unbearable suffering in the context of the euthanasia law.
An Alternative for Euthanasia?
Medical indications for continuous deep sedation are present when one or more untreatable or refractory symptoms are causing the patient unbearable suffering Verkerk et al. A second precondition for the use of continuous deep sedation is the expectation that death will ensue in the reasonably near future—that is, within one to two weeks Verkerk et al.
Studies in the Netherlands show that the estimated life shortening effect of continuous deep sedation is limited in most cases Rietjens et al. As already described, the use of continuous deep sedation in the Netherlands was for the first time studied in and has increased from 5.
An important reason for the increased use of continuous deep sedation in the Netherlands is probably the increased attention to its use: Another possible reason for the increased use of continuous deep sedation is that it may have increasingly been used as a relevant alternative to euthanasia Rietjens et al.Frequently Asked Questions.
Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide by Rita L. Marker and Kathi Hamlon. One of the most important public policy debates today surrounds the issues of euthanasia and assisted suicide. The outcome of that debate will profoundly affect family relationships, interaction between doctors and patients, and concepts of basic.
8. What Is Euthanasia? 9. What Is the Difference between Active and Passive Euthanasia?
How Are Voluntary, Involuntary, and Nonvoluntary Euthanasia Different? What Lies Behind the Increasing Openness to Euthanasia, Especially Physician-Assisted Suicide?
Is Euthanasia a Moral Option? Learn how to write an euthanasia research paper with EssayShark. Look through our mini-guide and research paper example. Euthanasia Research Paper Tips and Sample.
Posted on September 18, by EssayShark. Euthanasia Research Paper: Writing Tips.
but anyone can not question the victims of euthanasia or regret their . This leads me to ask myself a question, “Is Euthanasia an ethical request to end pain, and suffering, or just a poor admit to commit suicide?” People argue that .
Involuntary euthanasia occurs without the consent of the individual, either because the patient is incompetent, because the patient’s wishes are not known, or because it is a policy to end the life of a person with certain traits (e.g., Nazi euthanasia policies).
Euthanasia in Australia - Although euthanasia is a complex and controversial subject, under certain conditions people should have the right to decide to end their own lives.